Representative Experience Archive
A former employee alleged a reduction in force adversely impacted older employees at a large national bank.
Amundsen Davis developed a texting program for an insurance company, in compliance with state and national laws, for the launch of a new marketing campaign.
In this successful professional liability matter, a construction company’s subcontractors sued the contractor for their fees. The client was looking at $58 million in exposure. In the end our client was ordered to pay less than $50,000.
Amundsen Davis settled this case on behalf of our client for 6% of the original demand on the first day of trial, after the potential jurors were issued questionnaires, which was also the day of arguments as to motions in limine.
Defended a building owner against allegations of lead paint in a building. The trial lasted 2.5 weeks, and the jury was deadlocked on liability. The case settled for $220,000.
Settled asbestos case for a de minimus amount on the day that oral argument was to be heard on the summary judgment motion.
Matthew Kees defended a large hospital system as well as a cardiologist against the plaintiff’s $4.5M claim alleging that they failed to diagnose an ongoing heart attack causing the plaintiff’s death. Following a 12 day jury trial involving numerous expert witnesses, the jury returned with a defense verdict and nothing was awarded.
The plaintiff was an installer who claimed that he developed mesothelioma due to exposures to asbestos. We obtained a dismissal of our premises defendant, and avoided our having to engage in expensive fact and expert discovery or filings.
Matthew Kees represented a logging company in a lawsuit involving allegations of trespass that essentially put the company’s business activities on hold. After a weeklong trial, the trespass claim was dismissed and an easement over the property was established allowing the company to continue doing business as normal.
Represented a heating and air conditioning contractor which had been sued by plaintiffs after defendant’s defective system forced plaintiffs to leave their home due to mold that rendered the home uninhabitable for an extended period of time.