Representative Experience Archive
Amundsen Davis successfully defended a multi-state transportation company against a gender discrimination and retaliation charge at the EEOC.
We represented a cheese and butter manufacturer who was facing trademark infringement. The case was resolved by a mediation agreement that allowed both companies to continue making and selling their butter.
Amundsen Davis obtained a not guilty verdict for a Fortune 500 company accused of breaching an alleged $3.3 million oral contract. After a week-long jury trial, the jury sided with the defense finding that the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of the contract in question.
Amundsen Davis obtained judgment on the pleadings for a carrier in a declaratory judgment action that sought to stack multiple per vehicle limits within a single policy based on ambiguous and contradictory policy language.
Amundsen Davis favorably settled a declaratory judgment action on behalf of a carrier for less than policy limits where multiple claimants alleged that the carrier could not set-off from its policy limit workers’ compensation amounts that were paid to the other claimant.
Amundsen Davis obtained a not guilty verdict in a claim brought by a prominent roofing company against three former employees and top salesmen.
Amundsen Davis represented a national real estate investment trust company against allegation of tortious interference, violation of right to privacy, and discrimination among other claims. The court granted summary judgment in favor of our client.
Amundsen Davis represented real estate sellers against buyers who claimed our clients knew their mature trees were infested with wood-boring insects and failed to disclosed this fact. As a result of this summary judgment ruling, the case against our clients was dismissed in full with prejudice.
Amundsen Davis defended a large hotel chain against a guest’s claim that they had been exposed to toxic chemicals during an extended stay at the hotel. Following discovery, a summary judgment and dismissal of all claims was obtained. The order of dismissal was affirmed on appeal.
Matthew Kees defended a physician and a large health care system against a plaintiff’s claim alleging medical malpractice in a failure to diagnose a tumor over the course of many years. Following extensive discovery, a Daubert motion seeking to preclude the testimony of the plaintiff’s primary expert witness was filed. The court granted the motion in its entirety and the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit against our clients.